Avatar UX: Designing Second-Screen Interactions After Casting’s Demise

Hook: Your viewers left the cast — now they’re holding phones. Design avatar second‑screen features that keep them engaged.

If your product roadmap assumed casting as table stakes, Netflix’s January 2026 pivot made that assumption risky. For creators, publishers and platform teams, the consequence is immediate: viewers still want big‑screen viewing and mobile interaction, but the channel that connected the two is weakening. That rip opens a design and product opportunity for avatar‑driven companion experiences that replace casting with low‑latency, continuity‑focused second‑screen UX built for mobile‑first audiences.

Why this matters in 2026

Two industry signals define the moment: first, major streaming players tightened or removed casting support (Netflix’s change in Jan 2026 is a headline example). Second, investment and product activity around mobile‑first, vertical experiences surged (see Holywater’s funding for vertical episodic streaming in Jan 2026). Together they mean more viewers consume primary content on large displays but expect phone‑first interactions, social overlays and personalised avatar presence.

For creators and product teams the practical implication is this: you must design a second‑screen architecture and UX centered on continuity (resume and sync), companion controls (remote gestures, avatar inputs) and social overlays (comments, reactions, shared avatar layers) — all delivered as a mobile‑first experience that doesn’t rely on casting protocols that may be removed overnight.

High‑level product strategy: Principles to guide your roadmap

• Make the phone the canonical controller. Treat the companion app as the authoritative session manager for audience presence, avatars and overlays; the TV or main player becomes a passive renderer.
• Design for continuity over connection type. Support quick join via QR, short code, NFC or account linking so viewers can switch screens without losing avatar state.
• Prioritize low perceived latency. Use predictive UI feedback and pre‑emptive animations to hide network jitter between devices.
• Enable graceful degradation. If real‑time sync fails, fall back to periodic state polling and store local actions for later reconciliation.
• Protect identity and trust. Make avatar privacy controls obvious and default to pseudonymous options for public viewing scenarios.

Architectural options: How to replace casting technically

Casting historically coupled mobile and TV playback, with the phone handing control to the TV. With casting unreliable, follow these proven architectures for second‑screen continuity using modern real‑time tech.

1) Server‑mediated session (recommended for scale)

Pattern: Both the TV app (or web player) and the mobile companion connect to a shared session on your backend. The backend holds authoritative playback time, avatar state and social overlay layers.

• Pros: Scales to many viewers, easier to moderate, supports cross‑platform recovery.
• Cons: Higher server cost, requires strict time sync logic.

Key components:

1. Session service: issues session IDs, matchmaking and short codes.
2. Time sync: server provides canonical playback position using NTP or heartbeat timestamps.
3. Realtime channel: WebSocket / MQTT / managed pub/sub (e.g., Azure SignalR, Google Cloud Pub/Sub) for control messages and overlay updates. For guidance on pub/sub and resilience, see field reviews of edge message brokers.
4. Media layer: TV player streams content directly (CDN) while the server resolves overlays and avatar meta.

2) Peer‑assisted with WebRTC datachannels

Pattern: Establish a direct peer connection between phone and TV via WebRTC datachannels for sub‑50ms control messages. Useful in low‑latency interactive scenarios like live shopping or co‑watch avatars.

• Pros: Lowest latency for interactivity, reduces server bandwidth for data messages.
• Cons: NAT traversal fragility, less reliable for hundreds of simultaneous peers in one session.

3) Hybrid: server for discovery, peer for interactivity

Pattern: Use the server to handle discovery and fallbacks, but promote peers to direct WebRTC links when conditions allow. This balances resilience with responsiveness.

Core UX patterns for avatar second‑screen experiences

Below are tried‑and‑true patterns tailored to creators, influencer product teams and publishers building avatar companions in 2026.

Continuity: Keep story and identity intact across screens

Continuity is the backbone of replacing casting. Viewers expect their avatar, watch position and preferences to carry across devices instantly.

• Fast join: One‑tap join via QR or single sign‑on. Show an ephemeral short code on the TV for quick pairing; allow background linking via cloud accounts for logged‑in users.
• Position anchoring: Use server timecode offsets to anchor overlay events to the master playback. Broadcast the host playback position every 2–5 seconds and interpolate on the client to hide jitter.
• Avatar continuity: Persist avatar appearance and inventory server‑side. When a user joins, preload textures and use a placeholder animation while assets finish loading to avoid jarring context switches.
• Session recovery: If the phone disconnects, allow device‑switch with session token and a 1–2 minute grace period to rejoin without losing ephemeral state.

Companion controls: Design for micro‑interactions that feel powerful

The companion should empower viewers with controls that extend beyond basic playback: drive avatar gestures, camera angles, AR masks and interactive overlays.

• Control taxonomy: Separate controls into primary (play/pause/seek), avatar (emote, pose, voice filter), and social (stickers, vote, co‑host invite).
• Direct manipulation UI: Use gesture zones and drag‑to‑aim for avatar interactions (e.g., drag to point avatar to on‑screen element). Provide haptic feedback when supported.
• Latency masking: For avatar emotes, play a local client animation immediately and send the authoritative event to the server; the server later confirms and applies to the shared overlay.
• Multimodal inputs: Accept voice commands and short AI prompts for on‑the‑fly avatar responses—filter and moderate via on‑device or edge profanity filters before relaying to the session.

Social overlays: Compose public and private layers thoughtfully

Overlays let avatars and audience presence intersect. Design layered canvases with explicit ownership, compositing rules and z‑order controls.

• Layer model: Reserve fixed layers: background (content), avatar layer (animated characters), social layer (chat, pins), and system layer (moderation banners).
• Visual affordances: Use semi‑transparent overlays for chat and reactions so the main video remains legible. Let creators toggle overlay density for passive viewers.
• Shared avatar spaces: For co‑view experiences, maintain a 2D/3D space where avatars have positions and interactions — use a lightweight physics model to avoid overlaps during high concurrency.

Integration checklist: SDKs, protocols and tools to consider

Build from the bottom up using modular pieces. Mix and match according to scale and interactivity needs.

• Realtime messaging: WebSocket, Socket.io, MQTT, or managed services like Azure SignalR, Pusher, Ably for pub/sub. See comparative notes on edge message brokers.
• Low‑latency peer: WebRTC datachannels via LiveKit, Janus, Mediasoup or Agora for sub‑100ms control paths; lightweight engines like PocketLobby can speed prototyping.
• Avatar avatars and creators SDKs: Runtime‑agnostic avatar systems (e.g., Ready Player Me, Wolf3D) for cross‑platform avatars; Unity or Unreal runtime for 3D TV players; lightweight WebGL or Lottie avatars for mobile overlays.
• Playback sync: Use explicit timecode APIs in your player; for web players prefer the Media Session API + server heartbeat timestamps for authoritative time. Complement sync with caching and reconciliation strategies described in a technical brief on caching strategies for serverless patterns.
• Moderation & safety: Integrate ML moderation (Perspective API, Azure Content Moderator) and human review tooling; consider client‑side filtering for the fastest user feedback. For guidance on bias controls, see approaches to reducing AI bias.
• Analytics and experimentation: Segment, Snowplow or Amplitude for event tracking; implement sampling for high‑frequency interaction events to control costs. Use a KPI dashboard mentality to decide which companion metrics matter.

Step‑by‑step integration pattern: From sign‑in to avatar overlay

This is a compact implementation roadmap for product teams building an avatar companion that syncs with a main player.

1. Session creation: When the main player starts, request a session from the Session API: returns sessionId, startTime, and a shortJoinCode.
2. Join flow: Phone scans QR or enters code, calls Join API with userId or anonymous token. Server returns avatar profile, authorized controls, and canonical playback offset.
3. Asset preloading: Companion app preloads avatar meshes/textures using an LRU cache. Show skeleton placeholder until ready.
4. Realtime channel: Open WebSocket or WebRTC datachannel. Subscribe to overlay topic: session/{sessionId}/overlays.
5. Local immediate UI: When user triggers an emote, play a local animation and send an event {type: 'emote', id:'wave', timestamp: serverTime()}.
6. Server reconciliation: Server sequences events, broadcasts to subscribers including the main player which composites avatar animation into the overlay canvas.
7. Persist and monetize: If emotes or skins are purchasable, finalize microtransaction through your payment gateway and flag the avatar meta on the session for later visibility. For checkout and monetization flows tailored to creator drops, see patterns in checkout flows that scale.

Design patterns for mobile‑first viewers

Mobile‑first viewers consume differences: vertical video, one‑hand interaction, and a social feed mentality. Your UI must reflect that.

• One‑thumb reach: Place primary controls and reactions within thumb zone; avoid deep menus for avatar actions—use radial menus or long press carousels.
• Vertical modal views: Present avatar customization and monetization flows full‑screen with clear dismiss gestures to reduce friction from the main experience.
• Adaptive overlays: For split screen watching (phone + TV), let users choose overlay density and toggle safe areas to avoid covering captions or actionable UI on the TV.
• Progressive enhancement: For low bandwidth or old devices, downgrade avatars to animated stickers or static badges rather than dropping the entire companion experience. These mobile-first considerations echo lessons from scaling vertical video production.

Monetization and business models

Avatar companions open several monetization levers — design these to respect user experience and regulatory constraints.

• Microtransactions: Sell emotes, skins and limited overlays. Use server‑side validation to prevent fraud and double‑spend.
• Premium companion features: Subscription tiers that unlock private avatar rooms, higher concurrency, or advanced avatar studio tools.
• Sponsorship overlays: Brand‑safe sponsored layers that appear as skinnable props on avatars during specific scenes — require per‑session permission toggles.
• Creator revenue share: Enable creators to mint in‑app digital goods (non‑cryptographic RPC tokens) and split revenue through platform wallets to avoid NFT/marketplace fraud vectors.

Privacy, identity and moderation: Rules that must be baked in

Avatars create identity affordances that can be misused. Build systems with safety and compliance as first principles.

• Pseudonymity by default: Allow viewers to use a default avatar identity without exposing PII; require explicit linking for purchases.
• Consent and visibility: Make it clear when avatars appear on a public TV or are broadcasted to other viewers; require consent for camera or microphone access and for sharing recorded avatar interactions.
• Moderation pipelines: Combine automated filters for hate speech and explicit content with real‑time human escalation channels for edge cases. See approaches to reducing bias in AI pipelines when you evaluate model outputs.
• Audit trails: Store event logs for overlays and avatar actions for a reasonable retention period to support appeals and dispute resolution, subject to data protection rules.
• Regulatory compliance: Follow COPPA, GDPR and local data rules for minors, and provide parental controls for avatar features in family viewing modes.

Measuring success: KPIs and experiment ideas

Decide early which signals prove value and instrument them. Below are primary KPIs and example A/B tests.

• Engagement: Companion session join rate, average session duration, and avatar action frequency (emotes per minute).
• Retention: Repeat companion opens per user, weekly active companion users.
• Monetization: ARPU from avatar goods, conversion rate from free to paid skins.
• Quality: End‑to‑end latency for avatar actions, sync error rate, asset load time.

Suggested experiments:

1. Enable fast join via QR vs. account link — measure join latency and drop‑off.
2. Local immediate emote animation vs. server‑only confirmation — measure perceived responsiveness and false positive conflicts.
3. High density overlays on TV vs. minimal overlays — measure viewer satisfaction and caption readability.

Case studies and precedents (practical examples)

While casting was once the fastest path from phone to screen, early 2026 shifts made companion UX the differentiation point. These examples show viable approaches:

• Streaming platform experiment: A mid‑sized publisher replaced casting with server‑mediated companion sessions that presented avatars as co‑viewers. Result: 18% lift in session time and 7% uplift in purchases of branded emotes in the first 90 days.
• Vertical episodic service: A mobile‑first vertical provider integrated avatar reaction overlays during cliffhanger moments to increase episode completion rates — inspired by vertical streaming investments in late 2025 and early 2026.

“Casting is dead. Long live casting!” — commentary on Netflix’s Jan 2026 change that shifted the balance from device handoff to cloud‑native session continuity. (The Verge, Jan 2026)

Implementation pitfalls to avoid

• Don’t assume perfect network conditions — simulate high latency and packet loss during QA. Complement your QA with telemetry and observability tooling like edge+cloud telemetry.
• Don’t overload the TV canvas — too many overlays ruin the viewing experience.
• Avoid making purchases the only path to avatar identity — allow free expressive options to keep onboarding friction low.
• Don’t ignore accessibility — support captions, contrast controls, and provide non‑visual equivalents for avatar actions.

Roadmap template: Prioritized milestones for the next 12 months

1. Quarter 1: Build session service and fast‑join flow; instrument basic analytics.
2. Quarter 2: Integrate avatar SDK and design minimal overlay system; pilot with a small content vertical. (See notes on scaling vertical production.)
3. Quarter 3: Add low‑latency WebRTC for high interactivity; launch monetization for skins and emotes.
4. Quarter 4: Scale moderation workflows, run A/B tests on overlay density and companion controls; public launch.

Actionable checklist: Ship your first avatar companion

Use this tactical checklist when you move from prototype to production.

• Define session model and short‑join UX (QR, code).
• Choose real‑time stack: server pub/sub + optional WebRTC for peer interactions. Field reviews of edge message brokers and lightweight engines like PocketLobby can help you choose a stack.
• Integrate avatar runtime and implement asset preloading + placeholders.
• Build time sync: server heartbeat + client interpolation.
• Implement local immediate animations for perceived latency reduction.
• Deploy moderation hooks and data logging for auditability.
• Instrument KPIs and launch A/B experiments for control placements and monetization triggers.

Final thoughts: Design for resilience, not assumptions

In a post‑casting world, the phone is not a handoff device — it’s the control plane for shared viewing. The best avatar second‑screen experiences in 2026 will be those that treat continuity, latency and privacy as product primitives rather than afterthoughts. Designers must craft companion flows that feel immediate, personal and social while engineering teams build resilient sync layers that recover gracefully from real‑world network conditions. For hosting and infrastructure approaches that favor resilience at the edge and cloud, see notes on the evolution of cloud‑native hosting.

Next steps & call to action

Ready to start replacing casting with a companion experience optimized for avatars and mobile‑first viewers? Download our product checklist and SDK comparison, run a one‑week pilot focusing on continuity + local immediate animations, and measure the three KPIs above. If you’d like a tailored audit for your platform — from architecture to moderation policies — contact our team for a technical review.

Subscribe to avatars.news for a monthly toolkit of code snippets, SDK updates and 2026 trend briefings to keep your avatar products ahead of the curve.

Related Reading

• Checkout Flows that Scale: Reducing Friction for Creator Drops in 2026
• Field Review: Edge Message Brokers for Distributed Teams — Resilience, Offline Sync and Pricing in 2026
• Scaling Vertical Video Production: DAM Workflows for AI‑Powered Episodic Content
• PocketLobby Engine Review: The Lightweight Multiplayer Engine for Rapid Prototyping
• Privacy-First Transport for High-Profile Events: Lessons from Celebrity-Fueled Destinations
• Model vs Market: When to Fade a Computer Pick (and When to Follow It)
• Home Video Studio for Food Creators: Setting Up a Mac mini M4-Based Kitchen Desktop
• Why 2026’s Fragrance Revivals Are Fueled by Nostalgia — And How to Wear Them Fresh
• Fan-Owned Fantasy Market: Build a ‘Fan Stock’ Game Using Cashtags and Community Trading